GeForce GTX 670 Review: Lower Price, Great Performance - bedfordheaust

At a Glance

Practiced's Rating

Pros

• Operation equaling previous heights-end GTX 580
• $100 to a lesser degree the GTX 680

Cons

• Slightly to a lesser extent power-efficient than GTX 680

Our Verdict

Nvidia's latest GPU equals the performance of its treble-end predecessor, the GTX 580, with a less rarified price. IT's near as quiet and power-efficient as a GTX 680, too.

Nvidia's GTX 670 arrives hot on the heels of the super-expensive, dual-GPU GTX 690. The 690's high-minded price–a air-conditioned grand, if you can find it–makes it of special interest to most gamers. The GTX 670, but then, offers execution as good or better than last year's high-end GTX 580 while consuming much to a lesser extent power. At roughly $399, it's tranquillise not a budget card, but information technology's surely affordable for users looking for for a robust PC gaming experience on HD-result displays, but unwilling to casing out the $500 operating theater more necessary for its high-close cousin, the GTX 680.

Have's take a excitable deal the speeds and feeds for the GTX 670, and get a line clean how information technology's different from its pricier cousin. Mark that clock frequencies are for the reference board. Shipping retail boards may differ in clock frequencies, depending on the design of the circuit card and what the society shipping the board wants to hold up.

Feature	GTX 670	GTX 680
Graphics Cores	1344	1536
Texture Units	112	128
ROPs	32	32
Base Time Frequence	915 MHz	1006 Megacycle
Boost Clock Absolute frequency	980 MHz	1058 MHz
Memory (Frequency)	2GB GDDR5 (1502 MHz)	2GB GDDR5 (1502 MHz)
Memory Interface	256-bit	256-bit
Transistor Count	3.5 billion	3.5 billion
Showing Connectors	2 x Dual Link up DVI, 2 x HDMI 1.4a (Fast), 2 x DisplayPort 1.2	2 x Dual Link DVI, 2 x HDMI 1.4a (Fast), 2 x DisplayPort 1.2
Power Connectors	2 x 6-personal identification number PCIe	2 x 6-pin PCIe
Thermal Design King (TDP)	170W	195W

The chip used in the GTX 670 is the accurate homophonic GK104 GPU as the high-end GTX 680, merely with one entire usefulness block–what Nvidia calls an "SMX"–out of action. The time frequency is a little lower for the GPU core itself, but the retentivity clock oftenness and measure are identical.

Those are the lowborn spectacles in a nutshell. At present it's time to feel out how the reference gameboard really performs.

Performance

Performance data was collected using FutureMark's 3DMark 2011 and cinque DirectX 11 games: Crysis 2, Shogun 2: Total Warfare, DiRT3, Metro 2033, and Batman: Arkham City. Also, system power under idle and load was plumbed using a Watts Up Pro power time. The system used for testing consisted of an Intel Core i7 3960X running at 3.3GHz with 12GB of DDR3 RAM run at 1600MHz. Index supply, motherboard, and unusual hardware remained the same during the integral run, as did the OS, Windows 7 Final x64.

Nvidia's new $399 card easily bests last year's high-end GTX 580 in 3DMark 2011, as well American Samoa both current high-end GPUs from AMD, the Radeon HD 7950 and Radeon HD 7970.

It's worth noting that the GTX 670 easily beat generation last year's model, likewise as the similarly priced Radeon HD 7950. The average back performance is in essence a dead heat with the pricier Radeon HD 7970.

It's impressive how idle power has improved on all the on-going-generation cards. However, it's also worth noting that the GTX 670 used here used up just a little more power than a GTX 680 source board. The actual difference was only a couple of Isaac Watts, so it's probably antitrust variation in manufacturing.

Under full onus, measured when running 3DMark 2011 at very high resolutions and all features maxed out, the GTX 670 proves to cost the most efficient card, though the Radeon HD 7950 is just a step behind.

Availableness

Cards are shipping now, from a variety of manufacturers, including Asus, eVGA, Gainward, and more. While the prey price is $399, prices will likely vary, conditional the level of mill

overclocking and other enclosed features. The eVGA card, for example, will ship with a base time of 967MHz, as well as push the memory clock to an impressive 1552MHz. Well-nig companies building cards based on the GTX 670 wish ship factory-overclocked versions. Some even take up much two slots.

Actual availability is an open question. The primary GTX 680 has been difficult to find, with waiting lists for cards from most online retailers. It's possible that GTX 670 cards will glucinium built from GPU dies that weren't able-bodied to pass full GTX 680 certification. If so, more of them should hit retail shelves.

Final Thoughts

At $399, the GTX 670 is still aimed more at the subset of towering-last gamers who are likely playing on a single, HD resolution showing. At $100 less, you nonmoving start out performance better than last twelvemonth's high-end GPU from Nvidia, and equaling more expensive cards founded on AMD's Radeon HD 7970.

The card is amazingly wad for its performance, and should fit in all but midtower cases–even those lacking the depth to handle extraordinary higher-destruction cards. Power-supply requirements should be modest–a good 500W PSU should do the trick.

If you're a serious Personal computer gamer thinking about upgrading, and already have a GTX 580 or similar high-end card, it's probably not worth moving to a GTX 670. But if you have an older GTX 200 series or 400 series card, it may exist healthy deserving the investment.

Source: https://www.pcworld.com/article/464414/geforce_gtx_670_review_lower_price_great_performance.html

Posted by: bedfordheaust.blogspot.com

Share this post